1. His tone is one of enlightenment. He uses his experience to inform his audience about students. Furthermore, he speaks about students in a way that fellow professors can understand easily.
2. I think his classifications are fair from what he has experienced. I find some of his classifications very accurate. However, he does not represent the full spectrum of students, because there are different cultures across the world. People from different cultures have differing types of students. He does not take them fully into account.
3. With a few minor differences, the classifications are still mostly accurate. All of these types of students are at USI, and I have noticed another type. This type of student is now back in school at an older age, after being fired or laid off from their job, due to the economy. They are working towards a degree, so they can find a new career to support their life.
No comments:
Post a Comment